电臀,87873手机单机游戏下载,蕲春租房
(1) the contributions of the team members were equal; (2) the team atmosphere was good; and (3) the team decisions were participative. For these three items the respondents were provided alternatives along a Likert scale (1 ¼ strongly disagree, 2 ¼ disagree, 3 ¼ neutral, 4 ¼ agree, 5 ¼ strongly agree). The alpha Cronbach coefficient here was 0.77.The Essay is provided by UK Assignment http://www.szdhsjt.com The questionnaire also included the following background data: Gender (1 ¼ male, 2 ¼ female), age, marital status, occupational status and the main functional area in the MBA studies. Leadership team cohesiveness 67 Knowledge level. Another source of data provided the member knowledge level. It consisted of the exam results of each one of the team members. The exams measured the knowledge level of the participant concerning the business simulation guide and the firm management report. The participant knowledge level was based on the average grades of a written multiple-choice exam and of oral exams. Team performance score. The final data source was a team performance score. This score was based on the team assignments grades (34 percent) and the firm performance rating grade (66 percent). The team assignments grade was based on the average grade of the following assignments: . explanations of the firm’s management decisions during all the simulation runs; . initial strategy report; and . in-depth analysis of one of the functional areas. The firm performance rating grade was composed of the grades of the two stages of the business simulation: Managing an existing firm (46 percent) and managing a new venture (54 percent). The firm performance rating was calculated according to the short term business performance as represented by the accumulated net profits and the long term potential of the firm (such as: R&D outcomes, investments in fixed assets and improvement trends). Data analysis The statistical package used in this study was SPSS. First, descriptive statistics and correlation analysis were applied in order to get initial insights. Then, a t-test was applied to test the means of the team cohesiveness of the two leadership styles. In the next stage we used a cross-tabulation function in order to determine the frequencies of the leadership styles for males and females. Here, x 2 tests of independence evaluate potential differences of the leadership styles as perceived by males and females. Finally, a linear regression was performed in two blocks in order to find the relative impacts of the study variables on team performance.
|
