一仙当千,三星i618,中九卫星升级
team performance was found to be non-significant, while knowledge level and team cohesiveness on the team performance were found to be significant related to performance (p , 0:01). When this was further broken down by gender, the findings showed that for men, nearly 12 percent of variance was explained. Therefore, we can conclude that our hypotheses were partially confirmed and that, basically, team performance is a function of knowledge level and team cohesiveness. Also, gender is a moderator in predicting team performance. Discussion The purpose of the present study was to examine some of the antecedents of team performance. As organizations have placed many of their functions in the hands of teams, it behooves us to explain the process and try to understand what will help produce better, if not optimal, performance. Variables shown to be significant predictors in other contexts were used here. Team cohesiveness and knowledge are typical variables that have been studied in research on teams. Leadership which is usually associated with studies testing predictors of individual outcomes was included. Finally, gender, a common moderator in organizational research, was studied in two roles: moderator and as an independent variable.The Essay is provided by UK Assignment http://www.szdhsjt.com Findings supported some, but not all, of the study hypotheses. From the overall results, it appears that team cohesiveness and knowledge of tasks were significant predictors of team performance. Also, as expected, transformational leadership style |