红辣椒qvod,雷霆扫黄,天目木兰
|
According to the classical free trade theory, without the intervention of the government, each country can find its place in the world economic system, and countries with better conditions will be richer than other countries. Therefore, reducing the supervision of import and export restrictions will be more conducive to free trade (Zeng, 2010). The free trade policy is to support any construction that is conducive to a free market. For example, remove tariffs on imported products, reduce taxes on exports, and any legislation that can obstruct labor productivity. Free trade treaties and changes have a significant impact on New Zealand's agricultural development. New Zealand is a small agricultural exporter that follows the rules of the free market and is currently the most open agricultural market in the world. Fully opposed to the standpoint of protectionism New Zealand's agricultural industry is one of the biggest beneficiaries of free trade policies. For example, in 2005 it established a close economic partnership with Thailand and a free trade agreement with Chile, Brunei, Singapore, Malaysia and China. Since the first free trade agreement signed between the New Zealand government and Australia in 1983, regional and bilateral free trade agreements have become the main strategies for successfully diversifying New Zealand's agricultural industry products and markets (Van Kerckhoven&Luyten, 2014). The free trade treaty and its changes have a significant influence on the development of New Zealand's agriculture. The trade policies that support the export of agricultural products have not made the agricultural sector the target of high agricultural subsidies for the New Zealand government. Instead, it has made the agricultural sector the largest source of export revenue for New Zealand. This point can fully demonstrate that the removal of agricultural subsidies and the promotion of free trade in market mechanisms have enabled New Zealand’s agriculture to develop rapidly.
Therefore, developing countries industries must maintain steady and healthy development in the fierce international market competition. The key to effective industrial security protection is to seize the opportunities, cooperate with appropriate policy guidelines and institutional arrangements, and rapidly increase the international competitiveness of the industry.
References
ALTEMANI DE OLIVEIRA, H., & LESSA, A. C. (2014). China rising -- strategies and tactics of China's growing presence in the world: a special issue of RBPI. RevistaBrasileira De PolíticaInternacional, 575-8. doi:10.1590/0034-7329201400201
Cai, K. G. (2003). The ASEAN-China Free Trade Agreement and East Asian Regional Grouping. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal Of International & Strategic Affairs, 25(3), 387-404.
Cheng, J. Y. (2004). The Asean-China free trade area: genesis and implications. Australian Journal Of International Affairs, 58(2), 257-277. doi:10.1080/1035771042000220114
Dawei, C. (2008). A Chinese Perspective On The China--Australia Free Trade Agreement And Policy Suggestions. Economic Papers, 27(1), 30-40.
Dixon, P. B. (2015). Australia's Recent FTAs: Insights from Theory and Modelling on Rationale, Welfare Gains and Political Heat. Economic Papers, 34(4), 208-217. doi:10.1111/1759-3441.12116
Guo, Y. (2013). How China Navigated the Dilemma of Trade Liberalization and Government Revenues. Development & Change, 44(4), 991-1012. doi:10.1111/dech.12048
Haacke, O. (2016). Movement in the Free Trade Zones Signal Openings. China Business Review, 1.
Haichao, F., Yao Amber, L., &Yeaple, S. R. (2015). Trade Liberalization, Quality, And Export Prices. Review Of Economics & Statistics, 97(5), 1033-1051. doi:10.1162/REST_a_00524
Jiang, Y. (2008). Australia-China FTA: China's domestic politics and the roots of different national approaches to FTAs. Australian Journal Of International Affairs, 62(2), 179-195. doi:10.1080/10357710802060543
Khoonming, H., & Lewis, L. (2013). China: Shanghai pilot free trade zone is officially launched. International Tax Review, 24(9), 30.
LOHMAN, W. (2017). The Trump Administration’s Trade Policy and the Implications for Southeast Asia. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal Of International & Strategic Affairs, 39(1), 36-41. doi:10.1355/cs39-1a
Navarro, P. (2012). China's Currency Manipulation. World Affairs, 175(3), 27-37.
Tongyu, Z. (2017). Open Sesame: China Announces Further Opening of the Economy. China Business Review, 1.
Tso, C. (2016). China’s About-face to the TPP: economic and security accounts compared. Journal Of Contemporary China, 25(100), 613-627. doi:10.1080/10670564.2015.1132960
van Hoa, T. (2008). Australia--China Free Trade Agreement: Causal Empirics And Political Economy. Economic Papers, 27(1), 19-29.
Van Kerckhoven, S., &Luyten, A. (2014). The tale of a Trojan horse or the quest for market access? China and the World Trade Organization. RevistaBrasileira De PolíticaInternacional, 57193-209. doi:10.1590/0034-7329201400212
Wu, Y. (2015). The Open-Economy Trilemma in China: Monetary and Exchange-Rate Policy Interaction under Financial Repression. International Finance, 18(1), 1-24. doi:10.1111/1468-2362.12063
Yong, Z., Lili, W., &Yihua, Y. (2016). Trade Liberalization and China's Exports of Renewable Energy Products: Evidence from Product Level Data. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 52(6), 1281-1297. doi:10.1080/1540496X.2016.1152788
Zeng, K. (2010). Multilateral versus Bilateral and Regional Trade Liberalization: explaining China's pursuit of free trade agreements (FTAs). Journal Of Contemporary China, 19(66), 635-652. doi:10.1080/10670564.2010.485400
Zeng, Q. e., Adams, J., & Gibbs, A. (2013). Are China and the ASEAN ready for a Bologna Process? – Factors affecting the establishment of the China-ASEAN higher education area. Educational Review, 65(3), 321-341. doi:10.1080/00131911.2012.668872
|
