加拿大心理学作业：Critically discuss the differences and similarities(2)

To occupy literature as much as possible, in accordance with the following criteria: (1) at the same time using social support rating scale and happiness scale, and report the dimension or total score of at least one scale to another scale dimension or the correlation coefficient between the total score. (2) the subjects were normal people. Criminals, treated mentally ill patients are excluded. (3) the investigation time is at ordinary times. Disaster period, emergency period, such as earthquake, "SARS", and its front and rear exclusion. (4) the sample size is clear. (5) only one of the data is published repeatedly. If the dissertation is changed into a paper and published in the academic journal, and the relevant data is reported, the published journal article shall prevail. Otherwise, use the data in your dissertation.

The research on social support and subjective well-being is meta-analysis, trying to find the answer to the following questions: 1) society will support, especially the use of support, and the relationship between subjective well-being. 2) whether the different structure of subjective well-being is different from that of social support. 3) whether the research characteristics of the original research (such as the types of subjects, scale types, subjects, etc.) will affect the correlation between subjective well-being and social support, namely whether the research feature effect exists.

(1)

General and three dimensions of social support (subjective support, objective support, support the use of degrees) of the whole and subjective well-being, life satisfaction, positive emotions significantly positive correlation between moderate, with moderate degree of significant negative correlation between negative emotion.

(2)

Between the related subjects group type adjustment, namely different subjects groups, both related to the size is different, is not affected by the use of subjective well-being scale, the types of publication, published s etc to study the effect of characteristics.

However, the results of this study showed that the degree of disability was highest, followed by students and the lowest among the elderly. According to the previous view, the correlation depends on the degree of need and the subjective judgment of the possibility of implementation. The elderly, although is needed, they may think that the use of these support and not very good, or attempt to use multiple have hit a wall, so that they think using social support is difficult to achieve, and formed a kind of subjective judgment. Combined with bandura's concept of self-efficacy, this subjective judgment can be called support for the use of efficacy.
 

Reference list

Wen, Z, Geng, X, & Ye, Y 2016, 'Does the Use of WeChat Lead to Subjective Well-Being?: The Effect of Use Intensity and Motivations', Cyberpsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 19, 10, pp. 587-592, Business Source Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 26 February 2018.