11seba,疯狂赛车演员表,w380i
|
In summary, the different national capacity structure points out different national structures. In different time and space backgrounds, the national capacity structure is very different. The concept of national capacity has multiple advantages in the study of international relations history, which not only reveals the fog of sovereignty theory, but also clarifies the historical evolution of state form. At the same time, it can reveal the rise and fall of great powers in the history of international relations. Of course, national capacity theory needs to allow for the difference between time and space when applied to historical research.
Compared with Weber’s view, political power must be based on a ruling virtue in the subject dimension. The ruling body with good governance virtue, namely the ruling virtue, is generally recognized, supported and obeyed by the people. Thus, the establishment of political authority becomes an appropriate meaning. People-oriented virtue includes respect for the main status of the people, close contact with the masses and serve the people wholeheartedly. Excellent virtue ruling style is covered to emancipate the mind, seeking truth from facts, the core of ideological style, studious, and apply for the core of learning style, to be loyal to their duties, democratic equality as the content of the work style, to modest and prudent, and arduous struggle for content of virtues such as life style.
Finally, political power must be based on a political democracy in the institutional dimension. The legitimacy foundation of modern political authority can only come from the consent of the people, and the institutional basis of political authority can only be political democracy.
Bang, HP 2014, 'Foucault's Political Challenge', Administrative Theory & Praxis (M.E. Sharpe), vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 175-196. Available from: 10.2753/ATP1084-1806360202.
Bastien, C 2016, 'Readings and translations of Karl Marx in Portugal (1852–1914)', European Journal Of The History Of Economic Thought, 23, 5, pp. 794-813, Business Source Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 14 May 2018.
Cerella, A 2016, 'Encounters at the end of the world: Max Weber, Carl Schmitt and the Tyranny of Values', Journal for Cultural Research, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 266-285. Available from: 10.1080/14797585.2016.1141833.
Grosby, S 2013, 'Max Weber, Religion, and the Disenchantment of the World', Society, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 301-310. Available from: 10.1007/s12115-013-9664-y.
Hamilton, L. 2013. Power, domination and human needs. Thesis Eleven, 119(1), 47-62.
Haugaard, M. 2014. Power and domination: agency or unintended effect; equality or freedom?. Journal of Political Power, 7(3), 451-460.
Hibou, B. 2006. Domination & control in tunisia: economic levers for the exercise of authoritarian power. Review of African Political Economy,33(108), 185-206.
Jacobs, N 2017, 'Karl Marx-illustrious refugee', Political Quarterly, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 325-327. Available from: 10.1111/1467-923X.12354.
Mark Haugaard. 2012. Rethinking the four dimensions of power: domination and empowerment. Journal of Political Power, 5(1), 33-54.
May, T 2014, 'GENEALOGY, PROBLEMATIZATION, AND NORMATIVITY IN MICHEL FOUCAULT.', [History & Theory], History & Theory, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 419-427.
Munro, V. E. 2003. On power and domination feminism and the final foucault. European Journal of Political Theory, 2(1), 79-99.
Parsons, SD 2006, 'Max Weber and Economic Sociology', American Journal of Economics & Sociology, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 1111-1124. Available from: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.2006.00492.x.
Pereira, A. E. 2011. Three perspectives on us foreign policy: power, domination and hegemony. Revista De Sociologia E Política, 19(39), 237-257.
Portes, J. (2017). What Marx got right. New Statesman, 146(5372), 32-35.
Sowa, F. 2013. Relations of power and domination in a world polity: the politics of indigeneity and national identity in greenland. 184-198.
Stewart, A. M. A. 2001. Theories of power and domination : the politics of empowerment in late modernity. Sage, 50(2), 372-373.
|
