极限挑战停播,张值绿,行尸走肉第六季第10集
|
The case has involved the balancing of both conflicting principles of human rights：The religious and individual freedom on the other hand, versus the elimination of discrimination and equality on the other hand.
4.0Conclusion
The report in the above has introduced the general knowledge of arbitration in detail, which may help people to understand the meaning of arbitration more clearly. The arbitration has become popular in modern times, which has assisted the traders and international companies with international commerce to resolve disputes much more easily and efficiently. It is necessary to know arbitration and employ it to help resolve disputes. In the case, the main point is the equality and the religious freedom, for the Equality ACT has regulated that it is illegal to regulate the religion of the staff. There is some religious discrimination in the workplace in modern times, which should be prohibited by the law. The equality and the religious freedom in the arbitrator case should be balanced to some degree to comply with the law.
5.0Reference
Alcott, P., 2012, The human rights in workplace, Routledge, New York.
Betty Jane., 2011, The religious freedom in modern time, Eurospan, London.
Chambers, 2010, Arbitration and the decisions, Pearson Prentice Hall, England.
Davis, B., 2012, Business Management, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
Dopson, 2011,Equality in the society, Delmar Cengage Learning, Chichester.
Fitzsimmons, 2014, The development of the international business, McGraw-Hill International, USA.
Greasley, A., 2013, Operations Management, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
Gourvish, T.R., 1994, The discrimination in jobs, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
|
