该内存不能为written怎么解决,反黑 陈小春,于幼军是谁的女婿
|
In order to solve the above problems, the following two aspects can be improved in the future. First of all, because of the vast differences between the specific learning environments of different groups, researching and verifying the role of L2 acquisition hypothesis can not be separated from the study and discussion on learning context and environment. In addition to studying whether a certain hypothesis is effective, it should also study the mechanism of what it works and what is the condition for it to work. The conclusions drawn will help to better apply these hypotheses to specific teaching practices. Second, a comparative study can be used to study under the same conditions, whether teaching methods based on different hypotheses play different roles in the promotion of L2 learning, and longitudinal research methods can also be used to understand the short-term and long-term effects of various hypotheses on L2 learning, such research allows teachers and students to better understand the scope of application of each hypothesis, which will be more targeted to choose teaching and learning methods.
3.0 Conclusion
Input hypothesis, output hypothesis and interaction hypothesis reveal the law of L2 learning and education from different perspectives, and they provide scientific theoretical guidance for L2 learning and education methods. The three hypotheses play an important role in promoting the overall development of L2 acquisition. However, the three hypotheses still need to be further improved in the research methods, and more empirical results are needed to support the research conclusions.
References
Branden, V. K. (1997). Effects of negotiation on language learners' output. Language Learning, 47, 589-636.
Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Krashen, S. D. and Terrell, T.D. (1983). The natural approach: language acquisition in the classroom. London: Prentice Hall Europe.
Krashen, S., J. Butler, R. Birnbaum, and J. Robertson. (1978). Two studies in language acquisition and language learning. ITL: Review of Applied Linguistics, 39-40, 73-92.
Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: issues and implications. London: Longman.
Long, M. H. (1981). Input, interaction, and second language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379, 259-278.
Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4 (2), 126-141.
Pica, T. (1987). Interlanguage adjustment as outcome of NS-NNS negotiated interaction. Language Learning, 38 (1), 45-73.
Pica, T, Young, R., and Doughty, C. (1987). The impact of interaction on comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 737-758.
Romney, J.C., Romney, D., and Menzies, H. (1995). Reading for pleasure in French: a study of the reading habits and interests of French immersion children. Canadian Modern Language Review, 51, 474-511.
Swain, M. (1985). Communication competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
|
