姓田的名人,剧院魅影下载,仙狐诱魔
国际贸易壁垒和解决方案 这篇文章试图带来光明,一般目前国际贸易壁垒面临最近的例子和解决方案。 国家之间的贸易已经存在了很长一段时间了。亚洲和欧洲之间的贸易标志着这个事实,莫里森(2006年,pp.314 - 2006)检查这两个大陆长期以来从事贸易。他还表明,随着时间的推移,国际贸易已经走了很长的路到体积和国与国之间的贸易模式。莫里森(2006)已经被世界贸易组织(WTO)的数据(2004年,引用了2003年国际贸易统计数据,2002年世界贸易发展)从世贸组织的官方网站,亚洲的全球商品出口中所占的份额逐渐增加,美国北部的份额略有下降和西欧的份额已从2001年下台,但不是多达1990年。莫里森进一步表明,从2000年到2002年,中国的出口和进口增长了30%,今天,中国是世界上最大的交易商之一。因此,我们可能会注意到,国际贸易起着非常重要的作用在世界经济全球化的趋势。 理解“贸易保护主义”
保护主义是“蓄意使用或鼓励限制进口,使相对效率低下的国内生产商竞争成功地与外国生产商或保护和保存这些行业和生产者认为重要的国家利益。”(麦克拉肯,2005)
This essay attempts to bring to light, the general barriers international trade faces presently and its solutions with recent examples.
Coughlin et al (1988) state that Protectionist Trade Policies are meant to improve the position of domestic products as compared to its foreign equivalents, and that this may be done through various policies - by increment of the market price of the foreign product or by barring access of foreign products to the domestic market. They explain that protectionist trade policies aim to expand domestic production in the protected industries for the benefit of the owners, suppliers and workers of the protected industry. However this may lead to a downturn in the consumption of protected goods due to either associated rise in its price or consumers start using less of other goods as a result of the decline in outputs and increase in prices. Coughlin et al hence, argue that domestic consumers are said to be impaired as the price of the protected goods keep increasing. Hence, imposing of tariffs lead to domestic producers' and the government's gain, while domestic consumers' and other domestic producers' loss. These trade policies also affect foreign interests.
The theory of Absolute Advantage suggests specialization through free trade as it benefits the consumers if they can afford foreign-made products at a comparatively cheaper price than domestic products. (Warhurst, 2009) Coughlin et al (1998, cited in Ricardo's Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, 1817) demonstrated that two countries viz. England and Portugal were shown to produce the same two goods wine and cloth and the only production costs were labour costs. It was shown that England was comparatively less efficient to produce both goods as it was comparatively costlier to produce those goods in England. Therefore, it was said in this demonstration that Portugal had an absolute advantage in these two goods. According to this example, labour was the only resource considered to produce these goods when labour is among the many resources used to produce these goods. Also, the production costs of the additional units have been taken to be constant in this demonstration, but unit production as mentioned by Coughlin et al here, is subject to decrease or increase depending on the production. Elwell (2005) suggests that the gains from trade are mutual despite either nations' absolute advantage or disadvantage in the efficiency with which they produce all tradable goods. The difference in rate of production of one good must be limited for the expansion of another good among countries such that there is a comparative advantage among the two nations such that both benefit efficiently from trade. A nation is not to compete but look at the mutual benefits from trade. Therefore, each country must produce what they do best relatively. Comparative advantage is evident in activities that make use of profuse productive resource. Elwell explains this statement with the help of an example of the U.S. and China. He states that China, with a relative abundance of low skilled labor would find it beneficial to engage in production that requires low skilled labor, in trade. On the other hand, the U.S. specializes in production of goods that require high skilled labor. Also, the production of goods can be practiced such that a part of the good is produced in one country while another country can deal in producing another part required for the production of the good hence practicing the theory of comparative advantage. For example - American hardware companies send their products to China since it is much more cost effective due to low waged labor in China. This acts as a comparative advantage for both countries. Due to political motives, various governments still try to obstruct the system of free trade in spite of its acceptance globally, in Henderson's view.
|