加藤鹰电影,魔月馆奇谭,石家庄摄影学校
1.0 Introduction引言
艾滋病传播已成为当代社会一个不容忽视的重要社会问题。由于其负面的社会和经济后果，联合国于2000年首次将艾滋病毒列为安全危机（Haffejee，Ports and Mosavel，2016年）。为了解决艾滋病传播问题，各国政府和学者提出了各种解决办法，这些方法可以简单地分为两类，一类是采取法律手段惩罚艾滋病传播行为（Gable、Gostin和Hodge，2009年），另一类是采取干预性非惩罚性手段（ve）。Rgidis和Falagas，2009年）。关于这两种方法的优缺点，人们一直在讨论，尚未得出结论。本文探讨了采取何种手段控制艾滋病传播的利弊。
HIV transmission has become an important social problem that can not be neglected in contemporary society. Because of its negative social and economic consequences, the United Nations first classified HIV as a security crisis in 2000 (Haffejee, Ports and Mosavel, 2016). In order to solve the problem of HIV transmission, governments and scholars of different countries have proposed various solutions, these methods can be simply divided into two kinds, one is to take law-based means to punish behavior of HIV transmission (Gable, Gostin and Hodge, 2009), the other is to take intervention-based non-punitive means (Vergidis and Falagas, 2009). There is constant discussion about the pros and cons of the two kinds of methods and no conclusion has been determined. In this essay, it explores the pros and cons to propose what kind of means should be adopted to control HIV transmission.
2.0 Body主体
2.1 Means of punishment处罚方式
生理上，一旦感染艾滋病毒的人发展成艾滋病患者，他们的健康状况将迅速恶化，他们将承受巨大的身体痛苦，直到他们的生命被疾病夺去。从心理、社会的角度考虑，一旦艾滋病感染者知道自己感染了艾滋病，就会产生心理上的巨大压力。此外，艾滋病毒感染者容易受到社会歧视，很难得到亲友的照顾和关注。对艾滋病毒携带者的社会歧视会给他们和他们的家庭带来灾难，他们必须承受沉重的心理负担，这很容易导致家庭不和甚至家庭破裂，因为大多数艾滋病患者和感染者都处于养家糊口的年龄，他们往往是家庭的主要来源。利基金。当他们自己不能工作，也需要支付高昂的医疗费用时，他们的家庭经济状况很快就会恶化。对于有艾滋病患者的家庭，他们的结果通常是留下没有抚养过的孤儿，或者让父母独自一人（Balisanga等人，2016年）。
艾滋病毒主要侵犯20-45岁的主要成年人，这些成年人是社会生产者，他们支持一个家庭，一个国家的捍卫者。艾滋病毒已经削弱了社会生产力，减缓了经济增长，降低了预期寿命，降低了国家质量，削弱了国家实力。社会歧视和不公平待遇使艾滋病病毒感染者脱离社会，造成社会动荡，犯罪影响增大，破坏社会秩序和社会稳定。艾滋病毒孤儿和使无辜儿童遭受失去亲人的痛苦，他们经常遭受歧视、辍学、营养不良和沉重的劳动负担（Weber和Grant，2015年）。正是由于艾滋病毒传播带来了如此多的负面结果，许多国家将艾滋病毒传播纳入了刑法。尽管不同国家对故意传播艾滋病毒的具体刑事指控存在差异，但通常将这种故意传播艾滋病毒的“行为”认定为刑事犯罪并追究其责任（Brown、Hanefeld和Welsh，2009年）。
Physiologically, once people with HIV infection develop into AIDS patients, their health condition will deteriorate rapidly and they will bear great pain physically, until their lives are claimed by the disease later. Considering from a psychological, social perspective, once HIV-infected people know that they are infected with HIV, psychologically great pressure will be generated. In addition, HIV-infected people are vulnerable to social discrimination, it is difficult for them to get the care and attention of their relatives and friends. Social discrimination against people living with HIV will bring disaster to them and their families, they have to bear heavy psychological burden, which easily leads to family discord and even family breakdown, because the majority of AIDS patients and infected persons are at the age of supporting family, they often provide the main source of family funds. When they themselves can no longer work and they also need to pay high medical expenses, the economic situation of their family will soon deteriorate. For families with AIDS patients, their result is generally leaving unsupported orphans, or leaving their parents alone (Balisanga et al., 2016).
HIV mainly violates prime adults of 20-45 years old, and these adults are social producers, those who support a family, a country's defenders. HIV has weakened social productivity, slowed economic growth, reduced life expectancy, reduced national quality and weakened national strength. Social discrimination and unfair treatment make HIV-infected people be separated from a society, causing social unrest, increased crime effect, destroyed social order and social stability. HIV orphan children and make innocent children suffer from the loss of their loved parents, and they often endure discrimination, school dropouts, malnutrition and heavy labor burdens (Weber and Grant, 2015). It is precisely because of so many negative results that HIV transmission brings, many countries have included spreading HIV in criminal law. Although there are differences in the specific criminal charge of intentional transmission of HIV between different countries, it is common to identify such "acts" of intentional transmission of HIV as criminal offenses and to hold them accountable (Brown, Hanefeld and Welsh, 2009).
The intentional spread of HIV is a new crime. In this regard, some scholars are in accordance with the crime of deliberately transmitting sexual diseases to define acts of deliberately spreading HIV. The so-called intentional transmission of HIV refers to that those who know that they are AIDS patients or HIV carriers are through deliberate sexual intercourse, blood transfusion, shared syringes, organ transplantation to spread HIV to other people.
Governments of different countries have developed the provisions of criminal responsibility on deliberate transmission of HIV to others, so as to prevent spreading HIV (Sanon et al., 2009). In the United States, Georgia law provides that people with behavior of intentional spread of HIV will face 10 years imprisonment and penal sum of 5 million dollars. In Russia, people who knowingly spread HIV are punishable by imprisonment of up to five years; in Latin America, those who have acts of intentional transmission of HIV will be punished with three to five years of imprisonment; in Senegal, intentional transmission of HIV will bring a person to prison for 10 years, coupled with heavy fine (Gostin and Hodge, 2009).
Of course, it should also be notified that there are many shortcomings in the use of legal means to control spreading HIV. Firstly, the use of legal penalties is likely to cause social discrimination against AIDS patients, resulting in the stereotype that AIDS patients will be equivalent to perpetrators, and AIDS patients’ legal rights such as: privacy protection will be violated (Dodds, Bourne and Weait, 2009). Secondly, there is not enough evidence to show that the legal means of punishment can bring about public health benefits, but undermine existing public health efforts. For example, it undermines the relationship between AIDS patients and health professionals and researchers, so that many HIV transmission behaviors become underground and it is difficult to be found and managed, which on the one hand increases the cost of management of HIV transmission, on the other hand, it prompts underground HIV transmission (Gable, Gostin and Hodge, 2009). Finally, the use of legal penalties is likely to result in spreading HIV in prisons, because sexual intercourse with high risk are likely to happen in prisons and it is difficult to have an access to needles and condoms in prisons (Graham, Treadwell and Braithwaite, 2008).
2.2 Non-punitive measures
The legal governance of people at high risk of HIV agrees with the objective of establishing social order. However, there is an important objective for a country's strategy for governance of people at high risk of HIV, namely, the goal of public health through behavioral interventions towards a high-risk population of people living with HIV to achieve the goal of reducing the harm caused by HIV and other diseases to achieve the purpose of prevention and control of the spread of diseases to create a favorable public health environment (Mayer, Mimiaga and Safren, 2017).
The 100% condom promotion program in Thailand, which began in 1991, has resulted in a significant reduction in HIV prevalence among sex workers. It is considered to be "an effective measure to prevent and control the spread of HIV through sex, and it is also a low-input, high-yield intervention" approach adopted by UNAIDS and promoted worldwide (Chidrawi, Greeff, Temane and Doak, 2016).
Methadone and other appropriate drugs are used for maintaining treatment towards drug addicts to reduce dependence on drugs, so as to reduce HIV infection and spread caused by injecting drug to reduce disease, death and crime caused by drug addiction (Chidrawi, Greeff, Temane and Doak, 2016).
The importance of needle exchange in the spread of HIV has been recognized by many governments and organizations, and they have taken certain measures to intervene. In the United States, efforts to prevent the spread of blood-borne diseases among drug addicts rely on a network of more than 100 needle exchange programs (SEPs). SEPs are through providing clean needles to reduce AIDS and other blood-borne diseases (Chidrawi, Greeff, Temane and Doak, 2016). |
