We consider that the development of a management report is the element of assessment that comes closest to demonstrating professional competence.
我们认为，一个管理报告的发展是评价元件最接近展现专业能力。
Practitioners must be able to:
从业人员必须能够：
1. identify a suitable project for their management report, in terms of its feasibility and relevance to an organisation, as well as to key issues in personnel and development.
2. plan and design a project that demonstrates an awareness of strategic issues and has the potential to make a contribution to improvements in organisational performance.
3. demonstrate a satisfactory knowledge of existing literature, of contemporary personnel and development practices, and of policy issues in the subject area chosen for the management report.
4. access and interpret data from primary and secondary sources in compiling material for their management report.
1。识别他们的管理报告一个合适的项目，在其可行性和组织的相关条款，以及在人才和发展的关键问题。
2。计划和设计方案，论证了战略问题意识和改善组织绩效做出贡献的潜力。
3。现有的文献表明一个满意的知识，现代人才的做法，开发和选择的管理报告主题区域政策问题。
4。访问和解释从小学和中学在他们的管理报告资料编制的数据源。
5. make appropriate and correct use of techniques, such as interviews, questionnaires, participant observation and documentary analysis, in gathering data for their management report.
6. analyse the data that have been collected for their management report, by the use of qualitative and quantitative methods as appropriate.
7. draw realistic and appropriate conclusions from their management report.
8. present their management report in a clear, logical and systematic manner in order to persuade key decision-makers of its merits.
9. prepare a plan for implementing the recommendations made in their management report within a reasonable time-frame.
10. undertake a critical review of their management report and identify ways in which their project could have been undertaken more effectively.
Appendix :
Marking Criteria
The overall marking criteria for the module are:
This module will be assessed through the submission of a dissertation of 20,000 words. The dissertation will be evaluated against the following criteria:
• That the dissertation adequately defines an appropriate and agreed issue or area of investigation.
• That the issue was examined through a well designed and articulated method of enquiry.
• That the execution of the dissertation was adequately achieved.
• That the data collection was appropriate and the data has been analysed and assessed to an appropriate level.
• That the findings are related to the wider theoretical issues of the topic area.
• That the students can adequately reflect upon and appreciate the strengths and weaknesses of their own work.
• That the student has adhered to the university’s guidelines on research ethics.
Appendix - Guidance for Marking Criteria for Masters Dissertation
Classification Grade Relevance Knowledge Analysis Argument & Structure Originality Presentation
Distinction
≥ 70% Direct relevance to the title: address the implications and nuances of the title. Employs appropriate research techniques, methodology and paradigms. Conclusion contains originality. Extensive knowledge evident through appropriate application of that knowledge gained through very good research. Research of a quality that results in a clear, logical outcome. Research to be original and centred upon the research problem. Coherent and logically structured making highly creative use of the research in terms of the theoretical model(s) employed and the arguments presented. Highly original, exhibiting a high level of independent thought. Originality of research, of methodology and of ideas. An excellently written thesis with an extensive bibliography. Lucid and resourceful style conveying a high level of authority over the subject.
Merit
60 – 69% Directly relevant to the title: able to address the implications, assumptions and nuances. Effective use of an excellent knowledge and thorough understanding of relevant research. A very good use of analysis of the evidence, arguments and research undertaken, resulting in clear and lucid outcome containing original elements. Coherent and logically structured making creative use of an appropriate mode of argument and research. Distinctive work containing elements of originality throughout with a good level of independent thought evident. A very well written thesis with a reasonably extensive and relevant bibliography conveying lucidity and a good level of authority over the subject.
Pass
50 – 59% Directly relevant to the title. Adequate knowledge of relevant material – clear application of its significance. Good analysis based on good research. There may be some level of description and analytical purpose may not always be clearly maintained Generally coherent and logical attempt to make a coherent argument. Structured use of appropriate mode of argument and research. Occasionally at this level there may be a lack of coherence and of appropriate research. May contain some distinctive or independent thinking with elements of originality. The work will be sound and there may be some personal opinion. Reasonably well written thesis in a readable style with an acceptable bibliography.
Fail
< 50% Major problems concerning relevance of research and total lack of originality. Shows only a basic understanding of a limited range of research and methods. Largely descriptive with little evidence of analytical ability. Basic ideas evident but not supported by independent research with lack of clarity and coherence. Largely derivative, no elements of originality in evidence. Rather poorly written, deficiencies in expression, lacking clarity, deficiencies in the bibliography.
本文来自于http://www.szdhsjt.com/uklunwen/
| 
